• Larger Text
  • Smaller Text
  • Print Page
  • Site Map
Birds | Avian influenza factsheet | Improving pest bird management |

<download a printable factsheet>

Background

How does avian influenza spread among birds?

History of the disease in Australia 

Outbreaks in Asia

Implications for human health

What are the factors leading to cross infection?

So why all the worry?

Research and action in Australia

Avian influenza background

Avian influenza is an infectious disease of birds caused by a Type A Orthomyxoviridae virus. The disease occurs worldwide, and was first identified in Italy more than 100 years ago (Tracey, Woods, Roshier, West, & Saunders, 2004).  Influenza A virus has 24 known subtypes, and these strains may combine and re-assort within a host animal.  In wild waterbirds (which are a common host, and may carry the virus without showing symptoms) there is stability of the virus, with most strains being non-virulent. However, when several strains are transmitted to domestic poultry new virus combinations multiply readily, and a few strains (H5, H7) appear to have the capacity to mutate and produce severe disease or mortality in domestic bird populations.

The N1 variant of the H5 strain is virulent, and the one known to have crossed the avian/human barrier to date.

How does avian influenza spread among birds?

Infected birds shed influenza virus in their saliva, nasal secretions, and faeces. Susceptible birds become infected when they have contact with contaminated excretions or with surfaces that are contaminated with excretions or secretions. Domesticated birds may become infected with avian influenza virus through direct contact with infected waterfowl or other infected poultry or through contact with surfaces (such as dirt or cages) or materials (such as water or feed) that have been contaminated with the virus.

<top

History of the disease in Australia

There have been five known outbreaks of avian influenza in commercial bird flocks in Australia. These were in Keysborough and Bendigo, Victoria in 1976 (Turner 1976), 1985 (Bar et al. 1986) and 1992 (Selleck et al. 1997); in Queensland in 1994 (Westbury 1998); and in Tamworth NSW in 1997 (Selleck et al. 2003). All viruses identified at these sites were of subtype H7, with a relatively low virulence, and not implicated in transmissions to human hosts. In addition, Australia has had outbreaks of “Newcastle disease” caused by a Paramyxovirus which also affects poultry, and is carried in wild birds (particularly Psittacine) throughout the world.

Claims by two Australian academics that the H5N1 strain of avian influenza is already in Australia are unfounded according to Australia’s Chief Veterminary Officer, Dr Gardner Murray. (See DAFF website for full response to these claims).

On each occasion that an outbreak has occurred, poultry managers in Australia and the US have immediately contacted relevant authorities and control measures were implemented rapidly. Successful eradication has been managed by slaughter of infected birds, disinfection of premises, surveillance in the area and movement controls of all domestic birds. Eggs, meat and poultry products in Australia remain safe.

<top

Outbreaks in Asia

From mid-December 2003 to September 2004, poultry outbreaks caused by this fatal strain (H5N1) of the virus were reported in nine Asian nations (listed in order of reporting): the Republic of Korea, Vietnam, Japan, Thailand, Cambodia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Indonesia, China and Malaysia. Most of these countries had never before experienced an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza.

These outbreaks were followed by reports from Russia and nearby Kazakhstan. Soon after, Mongolia reported the detection of H5N1 in dead migratory birds, followed by outbreaks in poultry in Turkey and Romania.
Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Malaysia have announced control of their poultry outbreaks and are now considered free of the disease. In the other affected areas, outbreaks are continuing with varying degrees of severity (World Health Organisation, 2006).

Implications for human health

Unlike normal seasonal influenza, where infection causes only mild respiratory symptoms in most people, the disease caused by H5N1 follows an unusually aggressive clinical course, with rapid deterioration and high fatality. Primary viral pneumonia and multi-organ failure are common. More than half of those infected with the virus have died. Most cases have occurred in previously healthy children and young adults.

A second risk, of even greater concern, is that the virus – if given enough opportunities – will change into a form that is highly infectious for humans and spreads easily from person to person. Such a change could mark the start of a global outbreak (a pandemic).

To date approximately 190 cases over 9 years have been confirmed (Centers for Disease Control, 2006), with 92 fatal cases. Only a few of these cases involved direct human-human transmission. To put this in context, at least 200 million infected domestic birds have been culled or died from the disease. It is important to note that human pandemic influenza and avian influenza are different diseases. Human pandemic influenza has killed millions of people in the same period.

<top

Where have human cases occurred?

Hong Kong has experienced two outbreaks in the past. In 1997, in the first recorded instance of human infection with H5N1, the virus infected 18 people and killed 6 of them. In early 2003, the virus caused two infections, with one death, in a Hong Kong family with a recent travel history to southern China. Laboratory-confirmed human cases have been reported in four countries since then: Cambodia, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam.

To read a more detailed analysis of these outbreaks visit www.cdc.gov/flu/avian/gen-info/avian-flu-humans.htm

<top

What are the factors leading to cross infection?

In almost all cases where humans have contracted the disease, a number of common factors have been involved. These include:

  • Probable interactions between local wild water birds and domestic poultry
  • Direct contact with infected poultry or their faeces
  • Rural or peri-urban environment, where there are many small poultry flocks roaming freely
  • A high likelihood that ill birds are still sold, slaughtered and/or consumed, rather than reported (socio-economic cause).

In no instance to date has the virus spread beyond a first generation of close contacts or caused illness in the general community.

So why all the worry?

When compared with H5N1 viruses from 1997 and early 2004, H5N1 viruses now circulating are more lethal to experimentally infected mice and to ferrets (a mammalian model) and survive longer in the environment.

H5N1 appears to have expanded its host range, infecting and killing mammalian species previously considered resistant to infection with avian influenza viruses.  A domestic cat, tiger, leopard, civet cats and pigs have all contracted the H5N1 from eating infected poultry (UN FAO, 2006).  The behaviour of the virus in its natural reservoir, wild waterfowl, may be changing.   The spring 2005 die-off of upwards of 6,000 migratory birds at a nature reserve in central China, caused by highly pathogenic H5N1, was highly unusual and probably unprecedented.   In the past, only two large die-offs in migratory birds, caused by highly pathogenic viruses, are known to have occurred: in South Africa in 1961 (H5N3) and in Hong Kong in the winter of 2002–2003 (H5N1).

Ongoing large losses of domestic poultry are, of course, also unacceptable from an economic perspective.

<top

Research and action in Australia

There is no evidence that bird flu is affecting birds or humans in Australia at the present time.  However, there is the possibility that the H5NI strain could enter the country through illegal importations of birds and their products or through contaminated visitors.

Since the discovery of avian influenza, the level of biosecurity has been upgraded on Australian poultry farms to minimise the exposure to risk factors like wild birds, contaminated water supplies, other animals and humans. Contingency plans have been developed to minimise the impact of an outbreak through early detection and appropriate responses.

Another potential input source is from migratory wild birds.  Ducks and geese are the recognised spreaders of the virus, but Australian ducks and geese (although known to carry the non-fatal strains) are not migratory and rarely leave the continent.  (Much of the data implicating Anatids has come from Europe and North America where these birds are migratory).  It is therefore considered unlikely that Anatids will bring the disease to Australia.

We are, however, visited by a wide variety of migratory shorebirds, many of which pass through Asia.  Since the emergence of the disease in SE Asia in 1997, despite the 3 million migratory birds visiting our shores every year, Australia has so far remained free of H5N1.  Other countries on the Australian migration route like NZ, New Guinea, Taiwan, and the Philippines also remain free.  The scientific data to date have not implicated migratory birds in any of the five previous Australian outbreaks of the lesser strain of avian influenza, but surveying of populations has been inconsistent and inconclusive.

Given the increasing virulency of the H5N1 strain overseas and the lack of data on the incidence of avian influenza in our migratory shorebird populations, researchers at NSW Department of Primary Industries are attempting to develop more systematic surveying procedures and collate data on avian influenza incidence and strain type in our wild bird populations.

With funding from the Wildlife and Exotic Diseases Preparedness Program of the Commonwealth Department of Agriculture, Fisheries & Forestry, and the Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre; and valuable support from the Game Council of NSW (great network, in-depth knowledge of the timing and sites of bird movements, sampling data)  researchers are attempting to illuminate more clearly the role of our wild shore birds in hosting and transmitting avian influenza. 

The work involves:

  • Identifying species most likely to carry the disease, and the strains carried
  • Identifying the most appropriate timing for sampling (when do birds arrive and from where, seasonality of movements)
  • Identifying priority areas for sampling (where wild birds come in close contact with domestic ones, and where migratory shorebirds are mixing with high density Anatid populations)
  • Developing effective field sampling procedures (trapping methods, protocols).

Other research effort

The Australian Government announced through the National Health & Medical Research Council on 20 February, 2006, funding totaling $6.5million for 33 projects which are expected to lead to important advances in Australia’s pandemic planning.   A full list of successful grant applicants can be viewed at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/_files/pandemic.rtf

<top

Bibliography

Barr, D.A., Kelly, A.P., Badman, R.T., and Campey, A.R. (1986) Avian influenza on a multi-age chicken farm. Australian Veterinary Journal 63, 195-196.
http://www.cdc.gov/flu/avian/gen-info/facts.htm) Centers for Disease Control (2006), Department of Health & Human Services, Atlanta. Updated Feb 7, 2006.
http://www.fao.org/ag/AGAinfo/subjects/en/health/diseases-cards/avian_cats.html Agriculture Department, Animal Production & Health Division, Food & Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. Updated 30 March, 2006.
Selleck, P.W., Arzey, G., Kirkland, P.D., Reece, R.L., Gould, A.R., Daniels, P.W., and Westbury, H.A. (2003). An outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza in Australia in 1997 caused by an H7N4 virus. Avian Diseases 47, 806-811.
Tracey J.P, Woods R, Roshier D, West P & Saunders, G (2004) Emu, Volume 104, pp. 109-124, CSIRO Publishing, 2004.
Turner, A.J. (1976) The isolation of fowl plague virus in Victoria. Australian Veterinary Journal 52, 384.
World Health Organisation (2006) FAQs, http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/avian_faqs/en/index.html#whatare.
Westbury, H.A. (1998) History of highly pathogenic avian influenza in Australia. In “The 4th International Symposium on Avian Influenza”. pp.23-30.

<top